No Permit No Park Campaign Australia

What is the No Permit No Park Campaign?
We're glad you asked!

Disability Parking for Businesses

Information about your legal responsibilities and how you can uphold the moral responsibility legally with disability parking and enforcement

Read More

Access & Inclusion for Businesses & Building Owners

How to increase your patronage by up to 30% by making your business or building disability friendly

Read More

Access & Inclusion for Advocates

How to create positive change in your community following a few key guidelines

Read More

Download our Educational Flyer

Print your own educational flyers to leave on offending vehicles in disability parking

Read More

AS/NZS 3695.3:2016 – What is it and what does it mean for you?

I was alerted to an article published in various media sources that gave many mobility device users cause for concern and as promised, I have investigated.

I discovered there’s much ado about nothing.

The article (click here to read article) wrongly stated that changes were being made that would prohibit the use of certain devices on road related areas, public transport and other public space if they didn’t comply to the changes. It’s not surprising though that this misconception has occurred. They never write these documents in simple language and this one in particular has a significant number of past references to other documents so unless it’s read in context with those documents it’s jibberish.

So let me lay it out for you.

Australian Standards 3695 was already currently two parts. Parts one and two covered the design and testing requirements for mobility devices such as wheelchairs, powerchairs, power assist add ons and mobility scooters, to ensure they adhere to the safety standards required for sale in Australia. This third part is an additional part of the existing safety standard for a compliance labelling system called the Blue Label system.

What is the Blue Label System?

This will outline the requirements for devices that meet the compliance to safety standards for safe use of devices on public transport systems. There are already regulations and guidelines for safe use of mobility devices on public transport in each state of Australia. These requirements cover things such as width, length, weight and maneuverability of a device so that you can access public transport safely. The Blue Label System will make it easier to identify which devices are compliant to these safety standards.

See, what is happening now is that we are being sold devices that don’t comply to these existing regulations but many people are unaware until they try to use them and discover they don’t fit. It poses a serious risk of safety, particularly on the matter of weight, when the ramps that have be designed for loading us onto trains and such have a maximum load limit, and our devices exceed that limit.

So while the Blue Label System may make it easier for operators of public transport to identify that our device is not safety compliant and refuse us entry, this isn’t something new and it’s not a breach of the DDA because it is for our own safety. It is our responsibility to ensure that if we are going to need to use our devices on public transport that we acquire one that meets the safety requirements as this is what is also required to meet our needs.

The reference in the Standards draft document to road related areas is also an existing regulation under the Australian Road Rules that will be identified on a Blue Label or if a device is not Blue Label compliant, on a yellow label. It’s speed and slope stability. We are restricted to 10kph in public areas including footpaths and roads. Under the compliance requirements for the Blue Label your device will need to be either restricted to a maximum speed of 10kph OR, have an override switch that can restrict to 10kph and have a speedometer for use on road related areas. It also outlines the safety requirements for stability on slopes to a maximum of 7.1 degree pitch (although I do wonder about this one considering there are so many footpaths and access ramps that do not meet the safety standards for us to use them).

What does this mean for you?

Better safety. Better knowledge when purchasing a device.

Little Eleanor

Little Eleanor

Big Eleanor

Big Eleanor

I have two mobility scooters, known as Big Eleanor and Little Eleanor. I have two because they both serve very different purposes. Little Eleanor was my introduction to motorised mobility devices when I lost my capacity to drive independently. She’s small with a maximum speed of 8kph and easy to use in small spaces, such as buses and trains. I use her when I’m travelling long distances by public transport with short distances between destinations because her distance capacity is only small between battery charges. Big Eleanor is in excess of the size requirements for public transport. We tried. It doesn’t work. While I can get her onto the train she takes up the entry way and the wheel base width is in excess of the loading ramp width. She’s all terrain though and I can take her on all kinds of surfaces like the park with the kids, some beach surfaces and she handles the really crappy footpaths that are in dire need of repair but there never seems to be any budget for. She also travels long distances on one battery charge. She can’t go into supermarkets and she has a maximum speed over 10kph but also has an override switch to restrict her to less than 10kph. They both serve two different purposes but Big Eleanor will not be Blue Label compliant for public transport. She will get a yellow label outlining what her specs are.

I want to stress that there is nothing in the standards that prohibit you using a device that is not Blue Label compliant device in public areas provided it meets the regulations of the Australian Road Rules on the yellow label.

What concerns still need to be raised?

Well besides the fact that no matter how many organisations and websites related to disabilities in Australia that I am subscribed to I didn’t come across this document until AFTER public consultation had closed, I still have some concerns.

There is nothing yet to outline what if any, deadline there is for existing devices to gain a Blue Label OR how this will happen.
Who will re responsible for the expense if any of obtaining a Blue Label to continue using compliant devices on public transport.
Will there be any compensation for people who have unknowingly been sold devices that do not comply to the standards and cannot be used in any public area (lord knows there shouldn’t be any like this in Australia that are not for specialised use ie: beach chairs).

Unfortunately it’s not a simple task buying a wheelchair these days. It’s become as perplexing and expensive as buying a car. I hope this compliance system will make it somewhat easier for people to know what they’re getting into when they buy a new device.

To view the draft document of the addition to the standards click here

 

Selling the Back of My Wheelchair as Advertising Space

I’ve just discovered a new practice in advertising that needs to stop. NOW.

It seems innocent enough and someone probably thought they were really clever, low cost, relocatable, easy. What they haven’t realised is they are setting themselves up for the chain of causation should there be an accident. Here’s why….

There’s a standard in the building code in designing car parks. There are rules and legislation that must be followed and councils are responsible for checking everything has been adhered to and the building and surrounds are compliant before signing off on the Development Application Approval. If anything changes after that Development Application has been approved, council should be notified or else it deems the decision invalid. This is why even certain building and land renovations require a development application.

If the building is non compliant to building standards, access standards, safety standards or any other relevant standard, and council approve it, they could be liable for any future damage or injury caused. If this changes after the case of approval, the building/land owner could be liable, or the person who caused the change without permission of the previous mentioned.

It might seem so insignificant and trivial but there’s something that businesses have started doing that is not only an inconvenience, but also a risk to the public.

Covering of the bollards in the Disability Parking Zone (DPZ) with advertising material.

A Disability Parking Zone with 2 parking bays and a shared space between them. The bollard at the end of the shared space has been covered with a corflute triangular stand making the bollard less visible. There is also an advertising A Frame placed next to it making the shared space less accessible.

A Disability Parking Zone with 2 parking bays and a shared space between them. The bollard at the end of the shared space has been covered with a corflute triangular stand making the bollard less visible. There is also an advertising A Frame placed next to it making the shared space less accessible.

Bollards are placed in the middle space for a reason. To prevent vehicles from parking there. This space in the middle allows occupants of the vehicles parked in the DPZ to access the vehicle easily and safely and if desired, independently. Particularly for users of mobility devices such as wheelchairs or walkers.

The bollards are in a recommended position, recommended height and recommended colour. There’s also logic in that too. So that they are easily visible to drivers and they do hit them.

So hypothetically speaking, should a driver in a car park reverse into one of these covered bollards they have a case to claim against the chain of causation for damages if they can show that they were unable to see the bollard due to it blending into the surroundings or just not being clearly visible.

What gets me most is why, why on earth do people think using the accessible area is appropriate for their advertising? Is it because it’s cheap and convenient to them and they really don’t see us as customers so it doesn’t matter if they inconvenience us?

Seriously if you want some real mileage for your money on advertising, why not rent the space on the back of my wheelchair or mobility scooter? I got everywhere on my scooter, and being a young and sometimes trendy 40 year old I get some attention on that thing when I’m out. No, you wouldn’t would you? If you won’t rent the space on the back of my wheelchair, why use the accessible areas intended for me to be included in my community? As your customer? Stop being lazy. And inconsiderate. Your methods reek of ableism.

Image of the back of a wheelchair with a man sitting in it. There is a sign on the back saying "Advertise Here Call 1800 Stop Ableism"

Image of the back of a wheelchair with a man sitting in it. There is a sign on the back saying “Advertise Here Call 1800 Stop Ableism”

Our Emergency Service Vehicle Policy

Under legislation there are a number of exemptions for parking in a disability zone.

 

They include;

  • Tow Truck Drivers
  • Public Buses & Trams
  • Road Construction Workers
  • Oversize vehicles, and
  • Emergency Service Workers

There are conditions under which these exemptions apply of course, it doesn’t mean it’s just a free-for-all in disability parking zones and some additional rules may apply in different states.

We have worked closely with Police, particularly in Queensland to establish better relationships, understanding and cooperation when it comes to disability related issues such as parking enforcement. For this reason as well as the above, we respect their right to investigate allegations of any breach of their policy and procedure when using disability parking. I have contacted Queensland Police Service on a number of occasions when photographs with details have been sent to me and in all cases except for one, police were well within their right to park as they did.

For us to expect Police Services around the country to assist us in this campaign with respect, we need to support them with respect as well.

I appreciate that supporters of the campaign will understand this decision and that any publicly shared photos of exempt vehicles will be removed from our site or social media. If you wish to make a formal complaint to the relevant department for an incident you have observed we are happy to assist you with finding the contact details required. We can no longer make enquiries on your behalf. We don’t have the ability to keep up with the number of complaints. Majority of photos shared are outdated by several years in cases that have already been investigated and dealt with accordingly.

This policy is authorised by
Elisha Wright
Campaign Founder
No Permit No Park

 

You can find the National legislation here
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2006L00240

Part 19               Exemptions

 

305         Exemption for drivers of police vehicles

(1)   A provision of the Australian Road Rules does not apply to the driver of a police vehicle if:

(a)    in the circumstances:

(i)    the driver is taking reasonable care; and

(ii)    it is reasonable that the provision should not apply; and

(b)    if the vehicle is a motor vehicle that is moving — the vehicle is displaying a blue or red flashing light or sounding an alarm.

Note   Motor vehicle and police vehicle are defined in the dictionary.

(2)   Subrule (1) (b) does not apply to the driver if, in the circumstances, it is reasonable:

(a)    not to display the light or sound the alarm; or

(b)    for the vehicle not to be fitted or equipped with a blue or red flashing light or an alarm.

306         Exemption for drivers of emergency vehicles

A provision of the Australian Road Rules does not apply to the driver of an emergency vehicle if:

(a)    in the circumstances:

(i)    the driver is taking reasonable care; and

(ii)    it is reasonable that the rule should not apply; and

(b)    if the vehicle is a motor vehicle that is moving — the vehicle is displaying a blue or red flashing light or sounding an alarm.

Note   Emergency vehicle and motor vehicle are defined in the dictionary.

307         Stopping and parking exemption for police and emergency vehicles and authorised persons

(1)   A provision of Part 12 does not apply to the driver of a police vehicle or emergency vehicle if, in the circumstances:

(a)    the driver is taking reasonable care; and

(b)    it is reasonable that the provision should not apply.

Note 1   Emergency vehicle and police vehicle are defined in the dictionary.

Note 2   Part 12 deals with restrictions on stopping and parking.

(2)   A provision of Part 12 does not apply to a driver who is an authorised person driving a vehicle in the course of his or her duty as an authorised person if, in the circumstances:

(a)    the driver is taking reasonable care; and

(b)    it is reasonable that the provision should not apply.

Note   Authorised person is defined in the dictionary.

308         Exemption for police officers and emergency workers on foot

A provision in Part 14 does not apply to a police officer or emergency worker acting in the course of his or her duty if, in the circumstances:

(a)    the police officer or emergency worker is taking reasonable care; and

(b)    it is reasonable that the provision should not apply.

Note 1   Emergency worker and police officer are defined in the dictionary.

Note 2   Part 14 provides rules for pedestrians.

309         Exemption for drivers of trams etc

The following provisions do not apply to the driver of a tram, or a public bus travelling along tram tracks:

  • Part 4 (Making turns), Division 1 (Left turns at intersections)
  • rule 88 (Left turn signs)
  • rule 89 (Right turn signs)
  • rule 90 (No turns signs)
  • rule 91 (No left turn and no right turn signs)
  • rule 92 (Traffic lane arrows)
  • rule 99 (Keep left and keep right signs)
  • rule 100 (No entry signs)
  • Part 9 (Roundabouts)
  • Part 11 (Keeping left, overtaking and other driving rules), Divisions 2 (Keeping to the left), 3 (Overtaking), and 7 (Passing trams and safety zones)
  • Part 12 (Restrictions on stopping and parking).

Note   Public bus, tram and travelling along tram tracks are defined in the dictionary.

310         Exemption for road workers etc

(1)   A provision mentioned in subrule (2) does not apply to a person at the site of, and engaged in, roadworks if, in the circumstances:

(a)    it is not practicable for the person to comply with the provision; and

(b)    sufficient warning of the roadworks has been given to other road users.

Note   Roadworks is defined in subrule (4).

(2)   Subrule (1) applies to the following provisions:

  • Part 4 (Making turns), Division 1 (Left turns at intersections) and Division 2 (Right turns (except hook turns) at intersections)
  • Part 7 (Giving way), except:

–    rule 67 (Stopping and giving way at a stop sign or stop line at an intersection without traffic lights)

–    rule 68 (Stopping and giving way at a stop sign or stop line at other places)

–    rule 69 (Giving way at a give way sign or give way line at an intersection)

–    rule 70 (Giving way at a give way sign at a bridge or length of narrow road)

–    rule 71 (Giving way at a give way sign or give way line at other places)

  • Part 8 (Traffic signs and road markings), except:

–    rule 102 (Clearance and low clearance signs)

–    rule 103 (Load limit signs)

  • Part 11 (Keeping left, overtaking and other driving rules)
  • Part 12 (Restrictions on stopping and parking)
  • rule 224 (Using horns and similar warning devices)
  • Part 14 (Rules for pedestrians), except rule 236 (1) (which is about causing a traffic hazard by moving into the path of an approaching vehicle)
  • rule 264 (Wearing of seatbelts by drivers)
  • rule 265 (Wearing of seatbelts by passengers 16 years old, or older)
  • rule 268 (How persons must travel in or on a motor vehicle)
  • rule 288 (Driving on a path)
  • rule 289 (Driving on a nature strip)
  • rule 290 (Driving on a traffic island)
  • rule 295 (Motor vehicle towing another vehicle with a towline)
  • rule 296 (Driving a vehicle in reverse)
  • rule 297 (2) (which requires a driver to have a clear view of the surrounding road and traffic)
  • rule 298 (Driving with a person in a trailer).

(3)   Rule 20 (Obeying the speed-limit) does not apply to a driver:

(a)    driving a snow-clearing vehicle and engaged in snow‑clearing; or

(b)    driving a motor vehicle and engaged in speed zoning tests authorised under another law of this jurisdiction.

(4)   In this rule:

roadworks means:

(a)    construction or maintenance of a road; or

(b)    road cleaning; or

(c)    installation or maintenance work authorised under another law of this jurisdiction on, above or below a road; or

(d)    installation or maintenance of a traffic control device, traffic-related item or traffic monitoring device; or

(e)    a traffic survey authorised under another law of this jurisdiction; or

(f)    a road surface survey test.

Note 1   Traffic control device and traffic-related item are defined in the dictionary.

Note 2   A person may need to be authorised under another law of this jurisdiction to carry out roadworks or tests mentioned in this rule.

311         Exemption for oversize vehicles

(1)   A provision mentioned in subrule (2) does not apply to the driver of an oversize vehicle, or the driver of a vehicle escorting or piloting an oversize vehicle, if:

(a)    it is not practicable for the driver to comply with the provision; and

(b)    the driver is taking reasonable care; and

(c)    the driver is complying with any other relevant law of this jurisdiction relating to oversize vehicles, including the conditions of any permit or authority issued in relation to the oversize vehicle.

Note   Oversize vehicle is defined in the dictionary.

(2)   For subrule (1), the provisions are as follows:

  • Part 7 (Giving way), except:

–    rule 67 (Stopping and giving way at a stop sign or stop line at an intersection without traffic lights)

–    rule 68 (Stopping and giving way at a stop sign or stop line at other places)

–    rule 69 (Giving way at a give way sign or give way line at an intersection)

–    rule 70 (Giving way at a give way sign at a bridge or length of narrow road)

–    rule 71 (Giving way at a give way sign or give way line at other places)

  • Part 8 (Traffic signs and road markings), except:

–    rule 102 (Clearance and low clearance signs)

–    rule 103 (Load limit signs)

  • rule 111 (3) (which is about entering a roundabout from the right marked lane or line of traffic)
  • rule 116 (Obeying traffic lane arrows when driving in or leaving a roundabout)
  • Part 11 (Keeping left, overtaking and other driving rules)
  • Part 12 (Restrictions on stopping and parking)
  • rule 268 (How persons must travel in or on a motor vehicle)
  • rule 288 (Driving on a path)
  • rule 289 (Driving on a nature strip)
  • rule 290 (Driving on a traffic island)
  • rule 296 (Driving a vehicle in reverse)
  • rule 297 (2) (which requires a driver to have a clear view of the surrounding road and traffic).

312         Exemption for tow truck drivers

(1)   It is a defence to the prosecution of the driver of a tow truck for an offence against a provision mentioned in subrule (2) if, at the time of the offence:

(a)    the driver is engaged in loading, or connecting to, a vehicle to which this rule applies; and

(b)    the driver is unable to comply with the provision; and

(c)    the tow truck is displaying a flashing light; and

(d)    the driver is acting safely.

(2)   For subrule (1), the provisions are as follows:

  • Part 4 (Making turns)
  • Part 6 (Traffic lights and twin red lights)
  • Part 7 (Giving way), Division 1 (Places with stop signs, stop lines, give way signs or give way lines)
  • Part 8 (Traffic signs and road markings)
  • Part 9 (Roundabouts)
  • Part 11 (Keeping left, overtaking and other driving rules)
  • Part 12 (Restrictions on stopping and parking)
  • rule 288 (Driving on a path)
  • rule 289 (Driving on a nature strip)
  • rule 290 (Driving on a traffic island).

(3)   This rule applies to the following vehicles:

(a)    a vehicle at the scene of a crash;

(b)    a disabled vehicle;

(c)    a vehicle unsafely or unlawfully parked that the driver is authorised to tow away under another law of this jurisdiction.

Note   Crash is defined in the dictionary, and vehicle is defined in rule 15.

313         Exemption for postal vehicles

(1)   Another law of this jurisdiction may provide that a provision mentioned in subrule (2) does not apply to the driver of a postal vehicle.

Note   Postal vehicle is defined in the dictionary.

(2)   This rule applies to the following provisions:

  • rule 179 (Stopping in a loading zone)
  • rule 180 (Stopping in a truck zone)
  • rule 182 (Stopping in a taxi zone)
  • rule 184 (Stopping in a minibus zone)
  • rule 185 (Stopping in a permit zone)
  • rule 186 (Stopping in a mail zone)
  • rule 189 (Double parking)
  • rule 190 (Stopping in or near a safety zone)
  • rule 191 (Stopping near an obstruction)
  • rule 192 (Stopping on a bridge or in a tunnel etc)
  • rule 193 (Stopping on a crest or curve outside a built-up area)
  • rule 198 (Obstructing access to and from a footpath, driveway etc)
  • rule 288 (Driving on a path).

Who is really committed to building #InclusiveCommunities?

I’ve had an ongoing battle with my local council – Moreton Bay Regional Council – over their lack of understanding and commitment to access and inclusion for people with disabilities, mobility impairments and other users of wheeled devices such as parents with small children. After three years of battling the same arguments and being met with the same token generalised responses I decided to see where and how I could hold them to whatever commitments were put in writing. And there were none. My council doesn’t have an Access and Inclusion Plan. I emailed customer service asking where it is in case I couldn’t find it on the website and they replied they don’t have one, but they have a community plan which may have what I am looking for.

No. No, I am looking for an access and inclusion plan. I did look at the Community Plan. It’s very generalised and lacks promise or hope for people with disabilities even though we have a population of people with profound disability higher than that of Brisbane, Gold Coast, Logan, Townsville and Cairns Councils. Even looking for keywords showed very little thought for this significant part of the community.
The word Disability was mentioned once. In the entire 52 page document it was mentioned only once.
Accessible – 2
Ageing – 6
Inclusion – 0
Inclusive – 5
Cultural – 25
Corporate – 12
Asset – 11
Environment – 44
Business – 48

Hey, Moreton Bay Council, the 80’s called and they want their ideas back.

Qld councils population over 100k Access and Inclusion plans

*Population statistics are all taken from the same time frame for accuracy and may be slightly outdated to current statistics. Click link below to download the whole report in PDF

Qld Councils with Access and Inclusion Plans

 

With almost 5 % of the population in this council area having a profound disability plus another 17% having some form of disability NOT TO MENTION THE CARERS OF THESE PEOPLE, you’d think they’d get the idea it needs to be on the list of priorities up there with securing Ikea and Costco. I mean even North Lakes has it’s own special plan. The current most up to date statistics show there are 15021 people in North Lakes. There are 20593 people in all of Moreton Bay with a profound disability. North Lakes has a plan and we don’t.

Access and Inclusion isn’t just about disability. It includes the ageing population and carers of children. It means that our community is accessible to everyone in it. This is why we have the Disability Discrimination Act. Speaking of which, Human Rights Australia specifically recommends all governments, organisations and businesses that offer services to a community have an Access and Inclusion Plan. They can even register them on the Human Rights Australia Website.

Just thirteen out of 78 Councils in Queensland have developed an Access and Inclusion Plan of some kind with specific reference to disabilities. Only 11 of them are registered with HRA (some of these were pre – amalgamation). 14%

But this isn’t isolated. It seems when it comes to accessibility and inclusion Victoria is the place to be with 79 out of 79 councils having an Access and Inclusion Plan registered with HRA. 100%! Well done Victoria.

NSW has 58 councils out of 152 with a registered plan or 38%

South Australia has 28 out of 74 council areas on the same page of accessible and inclusive communities or 37%

But us in the land of the eternal summer, we’re way behind with just 14% of our Local Governments wanting to include us and make our communities liveable for us.

Note that it is understandable some Queensland Councils with populations so small and almost none of those living with a disability may not have it as their priority. But when there are councils with populations over 100,000 people, it’s just not good enough. We shouldn’t have to ask to be included.

Of course I’m not expecting much change any time soon since my own local councillor has no issue, just like her predecessor, about parking in disability accessible parking without a permit. I’ve tried walking the yellow brick road to the Emerald City. It was inaccessible. The channels they expect us to go through to voice our concerns have no accountability. We need more than one voice.

I’m running out of energy and running out of time to get these things happening but I am not giving up.
If you’re in an area that is like mine and you want to do more than just be a lone annoying squeaky wheel, do like I plan to do and get a machine full of squeaky wheels together.

That’s right MBRC, you haven’t seen the last of me yet.

As long as these things still exist in my community, you’re going to keep hearing from me.

paisley path2

Photo of a footpath that descends to a steep hill with the International Symbol of Access painted on the ground with the NO symbol painted over it indicating the path is not accessible.

Why I’m Quitting Naming and Shaming at No Permit No Park

Don’t get too excited! No one is getting rid of me forever. I’m just moving on to bigger and better things. I’m doing it now because it’s time. I’ve worked tirelessly on this campaign for three years and in that three years I’ve learned so much. Most importantly here we are on the 3rd Anniversary of launching the campaign and I’ve seen the results of our work. Campaigners, you should be proud! We’ve achieved so much. I feel as though I have taken the No Permit No Park Campaign as far as I can at this level.

So what happens now? Don’t worry I’m not about to lay down and die just yet. I still plan to be a thorn in the side of bureaucracy but it will be on a broader scale. My condition has deteriorated further and my mobility has been affected to a level that I am having more difficulty with day to day activities including driving. So I am driving less but using mobility devices more. I recently purchased and registered my first mobility scooter and while it’s changed my life for the better to a degree, I am noticing more and more about the obstacles in our community when it comes to access and inclusion. I’ve been promoting the #InclusiveCommunities ideals throughout the whole campaign but now I’d like to do more to see real action on the ground rather than governments rerouting emails to other departments trying to figure out who is responsible for the problem. It’s time it was just classified into one area and addressed nationally.

meeting with Bill Byrne

Picture Me with Fellow Local Community Advocate Belinda Norrie at Community Cabinet with Police Minister Bill Byrne, Communities Minister Shannon Fentiman and various department director generals and assistants February 2016.

When we still have more than half our city network train stations being inaccessible and rules that can’t be enforced or have no penalty, it shows that the issues are not being given the focus they need. When we have communities with population rates of severe disability 3 times the average in Australia we need to ensure we’re channelling the funding to the right areas. This is what I aim to work on in the future. Raising awareness to the right people of the issues that are falling through the cracks.

 

 

So here are some snap shots of the success the No Permit No Park Campaign has had.

Between 2010 and 2015 Queensland Police successfully issued 5996 PINs (Parking Infringement Notices) for Stopping in a Disability zone without a permit. In addition to that another 530 PINsPINDP by QP district 5 yr period were issued for failing to comply with the conditions of the permit. This graph shows how these PINS were distributed throughout Queensland’s Policing Districts. North Brisbane, South Brisbane, Logan and Gold Coast as well as having high population and more on street designated disability parking areas to meet population demand, also have high police presence to population.

What is also interesting is that these areas are in high proactive council areas where competition is high for parking infringement revenue by comparison to lower populated areas. This shows us that police have a good awareness of disability parking offences and address the issues considering the priority level of parking offences in the day to day work of police.

 

 

Even further evidence comes through looking at the top 25 Parking Infringements issued in the same period. It is expected that the highest three would appear as they occur so frequently on a daily basis in busy traffic particularly in high density areas, with drivers often thinking it’s harmless, or just completely ignorant to the traffic control signage around them when they stop their vehicles. These are the type of offences police will see as they patrol in vehicles and therefore easily pull up to issue the PIN. Checking disability zones requires some more effort with an officer needing to inspect the windscreen of vehicles, so they’re not as easy to spot as the highest three offences.

What you can compare to see that Disability Parking offences are taken seriously, is that other offences that we know occur at just as high a rate as disability parking, such as stopping in a loading zone for more than 2 minutes to drop off or pick up a passenger, have less than half the attention of disability parking. Any parent who does the school run knows how often this particular traffic control is abused 5 days a week.

The most significant part of this particular statistic is that in the 2010-11 year Disability Parking Offences were 8th highest compared to now where they sit at 5th highest.

PINs over 5 yrs ranked top 25

 

What does any of this have to do with No Permit No Park?

Here is the pièce de résistance!

PINs for stopping in DPB without permit qps 2010 to 2015 I first established the No Permit No Park Campaign in March 2013. It wasn’t long before I was engaging with MPs and Councillors but my favourite engagement of all time has been with Queensland Police. In particular with Assistant Commissioner for Road Policing Command, Mike Keating and Senior Constable Christie May of Brisbane City command. They have been supportive, proactive and encouraging throughout the entire campaign. I can’t go past without thanking SC May on the work she has done with Operation No Permit No Park with enduring tenacity.

We’ve not finished working together just yet though. We have a project under way that will be revealed during Disability Action Week this year and we will continue to further develop the Operation throughout Queensland.

 

Operation No Permit No Park has been incredibly successful in Brisbane City (hence why we are encouraging other police districts to join the operation), with not only a reduction of complaints to parking centre managers in the CBD that are regularly patrolled, but also a reduction in opportunities to issue infringements as people become aware that they can and will be issued with an infringement even if they only stop for a minute.

I would also like to recognise that without the assistance of Steve Zeppa at QPS/PSB none of this would have happened. He’s the guy that organises everyone whenever I send an email saying “can we all get together for another meeting?”

 

The campaign hasn’t just had an effect on police operations though.

 

PINs for not complying with permit conditions qps 2010 to 2015

I was also surprised to see that while there has been an increase in PINs for stopping in disability zones, there has been a reduction in PINs for non compliance of permit conditions. We believe this can be attributed to the improvement in the permit system since incorporating the Australian Disability Parking Permit Scheme in Queensland, but also the work we’ve done promoting education to permit holders. Encouraging them to be more vigilant about ensuring their permit is on display and displayed correctly, as well as not becoming complacent in having permits replaced.

 

 

We’ve done a great deal of work gaining the support of law enforcement on this issue and I’m incredibly pleased seeing these statistics knowing they’re doing the best job they can. Of course there is always room for improvement which is why I have faith that SC May will continue to work in this area with the Queensland Police Service.

 

 

What happens to No Permit No Park now?

The website and social media will remain as an educational resource. I will still continue to share informational posts as my time and health allows. Slowly it will evolve into an Accessible & Inclusive Communities campaign as I continue to work on these issues in the community. What probably won’t happen any more is the whole “name and shame” photo posts. I’ve said it before but I am absolutely adamant now that it just doesn’t work effectively and wastes a lot of my time as I have to remove defamatory comments, interject arguments and correct myths people share. A perfect example was a very recent post on Facebook. A lady shared a photo showing a vehicle that had parked in front of a disability access bay blocking access to the footpath with her pushing her son who uses a wheelchair. I had shared it to show as an example of how not thinking about where you park have have a serious impact on people with mobility issues. Did it get the response I had hoped for? No. Instead people made suggestions of violence and vandalism, insisting she take the photo to police, call council, get a tow truck etc etc. We can do that time and time again but it only affects that one person at that one time.

By showing examples of how these situations can affect people with disabilities and their carers we have a much better opportunity to educate a community rather than denigrate it which will be far more effective and beneficial to the disability community in the long term. So if all you’re looking for is likes and overnight viral fame wanting to name and shame someone there are plenty of other spaces on social media doing just that. If you want to be part of the success and educate your community for long term benefit, then visit our new pages aimed at giving key steps to various relevant areas of a community.

THANK YOU

I want to thank everyone who has joined the campaign over the past 3 years, for the support that propped me up when I wanted to fall, for the lessons in humility and most of all for making it matter. Thank you to those who helped me find my way getting started, helped me find necessary resources throughout the journey and just for liking, sharing and sharing my humour and wit.

I look forward to bringing better access and inclusion to your community and mine.

Me and my cat Princess

Me and my cat Princes

Elisha ‘Friday’ Wright
Campaign Founder
Disability Advocate
Future Crazy Cat Lady

 

Preventing Permit Abuse

PREVENTING PERMIT ABUSE
One of the issues that Operation No Permit No Park has highlighted aside from disability parking offences, is the variance of permit abuse or fraud.

 

It seems innocent now but this permit was discovered over a year ago. Permits are only issued for 5 years so prior to August 2015 this permit could not have been issued with that date.

It seems innocent now but this permit was discovered over a year ago. Permits are only issued for 5 years so prior to August 2015 this permit could not have been issued with that date.

People have tried everything from deliberate placement of the permit so the expiry can’t be seen, to removing the expiry and permit number, to manipulation of the expiry date, to continue using permits that are no longer valid. This is rarely done by the original permit holder. For whatever reason, people seem to pass them on to others when they have their replacement. I should note that so far my research has revealed that the most common situation for an expired permit being fraudulently used is once the permit holder is deceased. 
 
I have been working with the Queensland Department of Transport on ways to reduce permit fraud. Despite the conditions of the permit stating that they must be returned when no longer required, permits are rarely returned and it is not enforced.
 
The new ADPP style IS much more difficult to manipulate so we do see less abuse of those types but it does still occur by concealment. Queensland is not alone, with similar issues in other states with different types of permits. My goal is to share successful fraud prevention methods nationally.
 

The best solution found so far has been to include the holographic printing on the date like we do on the new style ADPP. It makes it very difficult to alter the date.

Permit misuse can be reported through the issuing authority. You will need the permit number, car registration and any additional information you can provide.

Qld: http://www.qld.gov.au/disability/out-and-about/parking-permits/#report 

NSW: http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/using-roads/mobility-parking/

SA: https://www.sa.gov.au/directories/customer-service-centres/enquiries-and-complaints

WA: http://www.app.org.au/

VIC: Contact the issuing council

TAS: Contact the department of State Growth Transport Scheme – Phone: 1300 135 513 Email: passenger.transport@stategrowth.tas.gov.au

ACT: Contact the Transport Authority – http://www.rego.act.gov.au/parking/special-parking-permits/australian-disability-parking-permits

One Quarter of Queensland Under-caters to disability accessible parking needs

With more than 26% of local government areas having a higher rate of permit holders to population than the mandatory disability accessible parking needs, we really need to address how access is assessed in Development Applications. Parking wars? We’ll show you parking wars. When you have 5% of the population seeking to use 2% of accessible parking (the minimum mandatory requirement under the Disability Access to Premises (Building) Standards 2010), it makes trying to live an independent and dignified life with a disability somewhat challenging.

Qld Disability Permit Holder Population Comparison

Download complete report here : Queensland Disability Parking Permit Population comparison

The #AusOpen Miracle

l don’t mind watching a good game of tennis particularly when someone as skilled as Roger Federer plays.

If I were to go to the Australian Open l’d need assistance. Anywhere with crowds, lined seating & stairs are a dangerous risk of falling. My OT recommends I should be transported in and out by wheelchair.

I’m sure I’m not unique in this. Many with mobility impairment rely on wheelchairs for safety. How many of us though have been accused of faking it the moment we dare stand up from our chair in public?

This is why disability activists globally are pushing to change language used to describe people with disabilities.

Wheelchair bound.

Regardless of the degree of our incapacity no one is actually bound to a wheelchair. This term leads people to believe we can’t get out of our chairs ever. So the moment anyone does we are fakes, frauds or miracles.

This is exactly what happened to an unsuspecting gentleman last night at the Australian Open. He dared to stand from his wheelchair to applaud a fantastic shot by Federer. Plenty of other people who weren’t wheelchair users did too but they were not vilified like this man was.

If you’ve never understood before why language around disability is so important, I hope you never find yourself with a disability.

I did express my views to many of these tweeters but none responded.

Screenshot_2016-01-29-07-56-29-1 Screenshot_2016-01-29-07-59-11-1 Screenshot_2016-01-29-07-58-20-1 Screenshot_2016-01-29-07-59-11-1Screenshot_2016-01-29-07-59-25

 

Media Gives Readers Bad Suggestion to Abuse Disability Parking

Today, Brisbane Times journalist, Nathanael Cooper, wrote about Nova presenter Mitch Lewis having his car towed after parking his car on private property at Westend. No big deal right? The towing company is authorised and the owner of the property has the right to have any unauthorised vehicles removed. Slow news day perhaps?

My issue with the article is when Cooper suggested to avoid hefty fees to retrieve your car, you’d be better off parking in a clearway or disability park on the street.

Image reads: RACQ confirmed that businesses were entitled to protect their parking spaces as long as there was clear signage posted, and that $550 was the standard rate for retrieving a car from a towing company. A quick check of Brisbane City Council's parking fines revealed drivers were better off parking illegally on the street than risking it on commercial premises. The highest parking fine, for parking in a clearway or in an area for disabled persons without a permit, costs less than half that of the going rate required by towing companies.

Image reads:
RACQ confirmed that businesses were entitled to protect their parking spaces as long as there was clear signage posted, and that $550 was the standard rate for retrieving a car from a towing company.
A quick check of Brisbane City Council’s parking fines revealed drivers were better off parking illegally on the street than risking it on commercial premises.
The highest parking fine, for parking in a clearway or in an area for disabled persons without a permit, costs less than half that of the going rate required by towing companies.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/son-of-wally-lewis-cops-kingsize-parking-fee-20160128-gmfwaq.html

What Cooper missed entirely is that if you park in a clearway you absolutely WILL be towed (I know this, it’s happened to me when I forgot I’d parked my car on a street that became a clearway at 4pm). Plus you still cop the council fine on top. Council, while it’s not common practice, can also tow a vehicle from a disability bay if there is no permit on display. They absolutely WILL if that disability bay becomes a clearway at any time. Most importantly Cooper misses the whole morality of just parking in a disability accessible space without a permit because there’s no where else to park. So sad, keep driving. People with disabilities have even less options available to them especially for those whose access needs are specific (ie wheelchair access). Chances are if you’re driving around looking for somewhere to park, so are we. Difference is we don’t have the benefit of easy mobility to walk a few more blocks.

Aside from the absolute insult to the disability community for even suggesting the rest of the community would be better off doing this, it’s really irresponsible to encourage abuse of disability parking.

When less than two percent of parking areas are allocated to disability access while around four and a half percent of the Australian population holds a disability parking permit, we’re already facing a challenge to access our community. Why make life even harder for us?

I hope a retraction is printed or at least an addition to remind drivers they shouldn’t do this. Of course we know I’m more likely to be told to get a life right?

Friday Wright
Campaign Founder & Curator

%d bloggers like this: